Progress is often imagined as a straight path—set a goal, study the problem, work hard, and achieve. But reality is far messier. The idea of linear growth is a trick our brains play, smoothing over the turbulence, the setbacks, the moments when everything feels like it’s falling apart. Yes, in hindsight, success looks linear, but true transformation happens in the chaos—in the uncomfortable, frustrating, and uncertain space where leaders either adapt and evolve or break under pressure.
This is the messy middle—the phase where excitement fades, uncertainty creeps in, and the weight of real execution sets in. The idea was good, the launch went well, but now? The results aren’t immediate, momentum is slipping, and doubt takes root. This is the space where companies are made or lost.
Breakthroughs don’t happen in boardrooms or perfectly organized planning sessions. They happen in the trenches—when projects stall, when clients push back, when execution reveals unexpected challenges. If you’re like me, you do some of your best work under a hard deadline. Pressure creates diamonds. But that pressure must be channeled correctly, or it becomes destructive. The messy middle is where most people quit.
Leaders panic.
Brilliant ideas die.
But those who understand how to sit with discomfort, when to push forward, and when to give an idea room to breathe—those are the ones who build generational impact.
"The quickest way to win is through the messy middle." – Rache Brand
What the Messy Middle Looks Like in the Real World
No matter the industry, the messy middle follows a pattern: progress slows, uncertainty rises, and leaders face hard choices.
Startups: Early traction fades, the initial wave of enthusiasm disappears, and investors start demanding results before systems are even fully built.
Creative Agencies: A project with a clear vision becomes murky as client expectations shift, feedback contradicts itself, and revisions feel endless.
Tech Companies: A new feature launches with high hopes but user adoption is lukewarm. Leadership questions the effort, and teams scramble to justify further investment.
Manufacturing & Operations: Supply chain delays, defects, or misalignment between production and sales create bottlenecks. Costs climb, pressure mounts, and leadership must decide whether to push forward or pivot.
Consulting Firms & Service Businesses: A promising new service fails to attract the expected client base, stretching the team thin between selling and delivering, leading to burnout and frustration.
Nonprofits & Mission-Driven Organizations: Passionate teams hit bureaucratic walls. Grant funding is uncertain, policies shift, and organizations struggle to scale impact while meeting institutional demands.
Across industries, the messy middle is the crossroads where leaders must decide: endure, adapt, or walk away.
Embracing the Chaos Without Losing Control
The key to navigating the messy middle isn’t about avoiding chaos—it’s about structuring it. Progress is never perfectly smooth or predictable, and trying to force control can suffocate innovation. Instead, great leaders understand when to apply pressure, when to give space, and how to create systems that push progress forward without stalling creativity.
The first step is setting clear parameters for critical decisions. Uncertainty breeds paralysis, and when teams don’t have a defined timeline for making key choices—whether to launch, pivot, or walk away—momentum stalls. Striking the balance between autonomy and accountability is essential. Giving teams ownership fuels motivation, but unchecked autonomy leads to wheel-spinning. High-performing teams thrive when they have clear expectations for outcomes but the flexibility to determine their own execution strategies. Some of the most creative solutions emerge when teams are forced to think differently within well-defined constraints.
Great leaders also foster a culture of rapid prototyping and iteration. Instead of waiting for a perfect, fully formed solution, the most successful teams test ideas early, gather real-world data, and adapt quickly. Small experiments and iterative learning prevent stagnation, transforming uncertainty into momentum.
Just as important, leaders must rethink how they measure success before scrapping a project. If something isn’t hitting initial targets, it doesn’t necessarily mean failure—it may mean the metrics need adjusting. Surface-level numbers don’t always tell the full story. Marginal gains, long-term potential, and qualitative improvements often signal hidden momentum worth nurturing. Sometimes, what appears to be stagnation is actually slow but meaningful progress.
The messy middle is uncomfortable, and leaders who don’t understand this often mistake discomfort for failure. But discomfort is not a reason to retreat—it’s a sign of growth. These moments of friction are where refinement, adaptation, and learning take place, but only for those willing to sit with the struggle instead of running from it. To guide their teams through uncertainty, leaders must model resilience. Organizations take emotional cues from the top, and when executives panic, disengage, or react impulsively, the entire team follows. But leaders who remain steady, confident, and adaptable create a culture where people feel safe pushing through challenges. And when obstacles feel overwhelming, the best way forward is to break them into small, solvable problems. Tackling one piece at a time builds momentum, turning what once seemed insurmountable into a series of achievable wins.
The Art of Letting Ideas Breathe
Urgency fuels execution, but forcing every idea to work on an immediate timeline is how innovation dies. There’s a reason some of the best ideas emerge in the shower, on a walk, or long after a project has been set aside. Pressure is necessary, but so is space.
Create Decision Windows Instead of Immediate Action. Give an idea a structured time frame to be explored and refined before demanding full commitment.
Resist the Need for Constant Validation. Great ideas often feel uncertain at first. Let them develop before forcing consensus.
Step Away and Return with Fresh Eyes. If an idea is stuck, walk away. Let the subconscious process it. The best insights rarely happen in front of a screen.
Pressure-Test Without Suffocating. Rather than scrapping an idea immediately, ask:
What happens if we remove one key element?
Can this idea work for a different audience?
What’s the scrappiest version we can test?
A Case Study in Failure: When Leadership Kills Innovation
A green finance startup attempted to scale a student ambassador program with a simple concept—sign up for their app, get a free houseplant. It worked. A creative director tested it at UC Berkeley, securing 10 sign-ups per hour. Seeing the potential, leadership approved a nationwide rollout but, under investor pressure, set an arbitrary benchmark: 1,000 sign-ups per week.
The first month was slow but strategic. The director built grassroots enthusiasm and trained local ambassadors for long-term scalability. By week six, recruitment surged, and sign-ups increased rapidly. By week ten, growth had spiked by 1,000%. But because it hadn’t hit the arbitrary goal, leadership panicked. They fired the director, replaced them with someone unfamiliar with the system, and cut investment in training. The program collapsed within weeks. The company—once poised for success—spiraled, losing talent and ultimately becoming a shell of its former self.
The lesson? Growth isn’t immediate. Leaders who mistake struggle for failure kill their own potential.
A Case Study in Success: Slack’s Billion-Dollar Pivot
Slack wasn’t supposed to exist. It was an internal tool built by a failing gaming startup. Stewart Butterfield and his team at Tiny Speck spent years trying to launch a multiplayer game, but engagement was weak, cash was burning, and the business was dying. But one thing was working: their internal messaging tool.
Instead of forcing a failing idea to survive, Butterfield saw value in what was working. He scrapped the game and pivoted entirely.
In 2013, they launched Slack. Growth was steady, not explosive, but they stuck with it. By 2014, Slack had 120,000 daily active users. By 2021, Salesforce had acquired it for $27.7 billion.
The difference? Slack’s leadership understood that success isn’t about avoiding failure—it’s about adapting to what works, even when it wasn’t part of the original plan.
The Power of Enduring the Messy Middle
Companies that survive and thrive aren’t the ones that avoid turbulence; they’re the ones that embrace it, adapt, and persist through the discomfort.
At Superstruct, we help companies not just survive but win in the messy middle. We equip organizations with the strategies, structure, and resilience to turn turbulence into transformation. Whether you’re experiencing stagnation, struggling with execution, or facing uncertainty about what’s next, we help you create clarity, structure, and momentum.
The messy middle isn’t something to fear—it’s something to master. Let’s build something that lasts.
This version keeps the depth while adding stronger storytelling, persuasive flow, and sharper impact. It speaks to leaders at a visceral level, making them feel the weight of their decisions while providing practical solutions they can implement.
Buy the book:
Comments